Hiya you!

Raise your hand if you’ve ever felt like your messaging was kinda making you look... not quite as legit as you actually are. 🙋‍♀️

You spend hours getting the words right. You tweak. You polish. You obsess.

And somehow... it still lands with a thud.

Frustrating, right!?

You know you're good at what you do.

But when you try to put it into words...

something gets lost in translation.

I once worked with a teen rehab clinic that was doing extraordinary work—deep integrity, highly specialized care, and results that spoke for themselves.

But their messaging tried to sound like everyone else’s.

They were leaking credibility by mimicking the big players (sound familiar?)

instead of owning what made them different: a strict intake policy that prioritized safety and fit over volume.

When we shifted their positioning and messaging to lead with that clarity, trust skyrocketed—and parents saw them as the safest choice.

If you've ever sent a pitch, a deck, or a marketing email that should’ve built your authority — but instead got ghosted — there's a good chance you accidentally triggered a credibility leak.

And credibility leaks are sneaky. They don’t show up in big, obvious ways.

They show up in the way you phrase a claim.

The way you explain (or overexplain).

The way you try just a little too hard to prove you belong in the room.

And when audiences spot one?

They don’t always argue or push back. They just quietly… stop trusting you.

That's the silent danger.

Because once belief starts to slip, it’s almost impossible to win it back with more facts, more slides, or a slicker deck.

You don't fix a credibility leak by "sounding smarter." You fix it by telling a better story.

Because when you wrap your ideas inside a real story —

A story that shows the stakes... the struggle... the shift...

You stop trying to force belief.

Story bridges the gap between "this sounds good" and "this feels right."

How to Spot (and Fix) the Silent Credibility Killers in Your Messaging

Sometimes it’s not the idea that costs trust. It’s the way the story gets told.

Small cracks — a stretch too far, a vague phrase, a wobbly shift in tone — create doubt faster than any competitor ever could. And once that doubt creeps in, it's hard to win the room back.

Here are four credibility leaks that show up when it matters most, and how to tighten them before they drain the story’s power:

1. Overpromising ("Big Talk, Tiny Walk")

It’s easy to lead with the dream.

The world-changing, industry-revolutionizing vision.

And in the first few seconds, the room might believe it too.

You lead with:

“We’re going to completely revolutionize the healthcare industry in the next 18 months.”

And on slide two, your biggest milestone is…

a pilot test with 30 beta users.

That’s the moment the audience leans back.

It’s not that ambition is bad.

It’s that the distance between your words and your proof was too far to trust.

Fix it:

Do share the vision, but walk them across the bridge with real, verifiable steps.

Instead of “we’re changing the world,” say “we’re solving a critical problem for 30 early customers — and scaling from there.”

Let them believe you because you showed them how.

2. Vagueness ("The Fog of Words")

Language that feels sophisticated on the inside often sounds slippery on the outside.

You talk about "innovative solutions."

"Dynamic platforms."

"Strategic optimization."

And you think you’re painting the big picture.

But to them?

It sounds like you’re tap dancing around the point.

And when people feel like they have to work to understand you, they stop trying.

Vagueness doesn’t make you sound visionary.

It makes you sound slippery.

Fix it:

Say it like you would to someone you actually care about.

Specific. Clear. Unavoidable.

If they can’t picture what you do after two sentences, they won’t stick around for a third.

3. Inconsistency ("Split Personality Messaging")

The deck says one thing.

The website says another.

The elevator pitch drifts somewhere else entirely.

Individually, each version might sound fine.

Together, they create friction — and that friction feels like doubt.

Not knowing exactly who’s speaking or what they stand for triggers a silent question:

“If they can’t stay consistent, how solid is the foundation behind this?”

Fix it:

Commit to one story, told the same way, no matter where the audience meets it.

4. Over-explaining ("Apology Tour")

You state your big idea:

"We help reduce hospital readmission rates by using predictive analytics."

It’s strong.

It’s clean.

But you panic — worried it’s not “enough” — and start layering on:

"And just to be clear, it’s not only predictive, it’s also reactive...and we’re in beta now, but we’ve had really good feedback...and of course, it doesn’t solve every issue, but—”

Now you’ve lost them.

Your confidence evaporated under a pile of disclaimers.

Fix it:

Say the strong thing. Pause. Let it breathe.

When you feel the urge to start adding endless asterisks and explanations, remind yourself:

"If they have questions, they’ll ask."

Your message is not a courtroom defense.

It’s a decision you’re inviting them to make.

If you're not sure whether your messaging passes the test, try this quick stress check:

🎯 4‑Sentence Credibility Stress Test

A strong message can be distilled into four sharp sentences and anchored by one hard data point, making it easier for audiences to trust and act.

Here’s how to pressure-test it before the audience does:

1. Open a blank doc.
2. Write exactly one sentence for each prompt below.
3. After each sentence, run the checklist that follows it.
4. Then read all four together.

If the story flows and passes the checklist, it’s ready to publish.

Before you publish that pitch or deck, run it through this simple 4-sentence test. It catches the cracks that break trust before your audience ever hits slide 3.

ⓘ We’re trying something. Want to try the AI version of our 4‑Sentence Credibility Stress Test (and some other tiny tools)? Go try it at ai.motive3.com. It’s free to try, and I’d love your feedback.

🤖 Bonus GPT Prompt:

Want to catch credibility leaks before the audience does?

Use this in your next team review, or when refining an investor deck. It's like having a skeptical buyer in the room—before the real one walks in.

Prompt:

Evaluate this as someone looking for a reason to say no.

Assume that trust is fragile, and that credibility can crack with even small mistakes.

I’m going to give you a piece of messaging (a pitch, deck snippet, paragraph, or headline).

Your mission is to interrogate it the way a buyer, investor, or executive would—specifically hunting for:

• Moments where promises feel bigger than the proof
• Language that feels vague, hollow, or overly polished
• Shifts in tone, promise, or audience that create confusion
• Signs of over-explaining that weaken the main point
• Attempts to sound smart that add complexity instead of clarity

For each potential credibility leak:

1. Identify the Trigger: Where does credibility crack?
2. State the Doubt It Creates: What unspoken question would the audience start asking?
3. Suggest a Pressure-Tested Rewrite: A version that would survive under scrutiny

[Insert your message]

Don't be polite.

Be sharp, clinical, and focused on protecting trust.

🔄 Your Turn

What kills credibility for you?

Seen a credibility leak in the wild? Share it.

Hit reply and tell me. (Mine is saying a lot without saying anything — aka vagueness and word salad.)

‍